切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华关节外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05) : 568 -574. doi: 10.3877/ cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2024.05.002

临床论著

偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良
许银峰1, 盛璞义1, 余世明1, 张阳春1,2,()   
  1. 1.510080 广州,中山大学附属第一医院骨科-显微外科医学部
    2.518100 深圳大学第二附属医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-17 出版日期:2024-10-01
  • 通信作者: 张阳春

Eccentric rotary acetabular osteotomy in treatment of developmental dysplasia of hip

Yinfeng Xu1, Puyi Sheng1, Shiming Yu1, Yangchun Zhang1,()   

  1. 1.Orthopedic, Trauma & Microsurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
  • Received:2023-10-17 Published:2024-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Yangchun Zhang
引用本文:

许银峰, 盛璞义, 余世明, 张阳春. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.

Yinfeng Xu, Puyi Sheng, Shiming Yu, Yangchun Zhang. Eccentric rotary acetabular osteotomy in treatment of developmental dysplasia of hip[J]. Chinese Journal of Joint Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.

目的

分析偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术(ERAO)治疗发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者的临床疗效。

方法

收集2010年3月至2022年2月在中山大学附属第一医院采用ERAO术治疗的DDH患者,年龄15~60岁,Tönnis髋关节骨关节炎分期<Ⅲ期,排除既往有髋关节手术史、需要行股骨截骨术的患者,纳入研究共78例92个髋关节。其中男28例,女50例,依据Tönnis髋关节骨关节炎分期:0期15髋,Ⅰ期67髋,Ⅱ期10髋。根据髋关节发育不良的Crowe分型,均为Ⅰ型患者。临床评估以Harris评分为标准,影像学评估则通过拍摄术前与术后骨盆前后位、患髋正侧位,观察头臼指数(AHI)、外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)及Sharp角等,观察有无感染、神经血管损伤等并发症。通过t检验比较术前、术后差异有无统计学意义。

结果

纳入患者平均年龄(45±16)岁,术后随访时间为12~138个月,平均随访时间(68±32)个月。术后及6个月的短期随访中,除2例伤口周围感染,无神经血管损伤等其他并发症;5年以上的随访中,有5例5髋再次行人工全髋关节置换术。Harris评分由ERAO术前(73.5±9.4)分提高至(89.8±6.2)分,差异有统计学意义(t=-7.8,P<0.001);术前Sharp角为(52.2±3.8)°,术后改善为(42.4±3.2)°(t=3.1,P<0.05);LCEA由术前的(10.7±2.6)°升至(35.8±6.5)°;AHI由术前的(48.9±6.5)% 升至术后的(88.0±10.7)%,股骨头中心与泪滴的水平距离由术前的(41.2±9.4)mm缩小为术后的(37.3±8.6)mm,与泪滴的垂直距离由术前的(20.8±10.5)mm缩小为术后的(17.2±10.1)mm。

结论

ERAO明显矫正了DDH患者髋臼畸形形态,改善了髋关节异常的受力模式,延缓了髋关节骨关节炎病变的进展,短期及中期疗效确切,是治疗DDH有效的手术方法,值得推广应用。

Objective

To analyze the clinical effect of eccentric rotary acetabular osteotomy (ERAO)in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

Methods

From March 2010 to February 2022, patients with DDH and treated by ERAO in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were collected. The patients who were evaluated as under stage III of Tönnis hip osteoarthritis staging and aged from 15 to 60 years were enrolled, while the patients with hip surgery history or requiring femoral osteotomy were excluded. A total of 78 patients with 92 hip joints were included in this study. There were 28 males and 50 females. According to Tönnis grades of hip osteoarthritis, there were 15 hips in stage zero, 67 hips in stage Ⅰ,and 10 hips in stage Ⅱ. According to the Crowe classification of hip dysplasia, all the patients were type I. The Harris score was used as the standard for clinical evaluation. Imaging evaluation was conducted by photographing the anterior and posterior positions of the pelvis before and after surgery and the anterior and lateral positions of the affected hip to observe the acetabular head index (AHI), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and Sharp angle,as well as to observe whether there were complications such as infection and neurovascular injury .Comparing preoperative and postoperative differences for statistical significance through t test.

Results

The patients were(45±16) years old on average, and the follow-up time was 12 to 138 months, (68±32) months on average. In the shortterm and six months follow-up after surgery, except for two cases of wound infection, there was no other complication such as neurovascular injury. During more than five years follow-up, five patients with five hips underwent total hip replacements. Harris score elevated from (73.5±9.4) to (89.8±6.2) after ERAO surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (t=-7.8, P < 0.001). The sharp angle was (52.2±3.8)° before surgery, and was improved to(42.4±3.2)° after surgery (t=3.1, P < 0.05). The LCEA increased from (10.7±2.6)° before surgery to (35.8±6.5)°. The AHI increased from preoperative (48.9±6.5) % to postoperative (88.0±10.7) %, The horizontal distance from teardrop decreased from preoperative (41.2±9.4) mm to postoperative (37.3±8.6) mm, and the vertical distance from teardrop decreased from preoperative (20.8±10.5) mm to postoperative (17.2±10.1) mm.

Conclusions

ERAO can obviously correct the deformity of acetabulum in patients with DDH, improve the stress mode of the abnormal hip joint, and delay the progression of secondary lesions such as osteoarthritis of hip. The short mid-term clinical effect is the definite results. ERAO is an effective surgical method for the treatment of DDH, andbeing worthto promote and apply.

图1 ERAO(偏心性旋转截骨术)术前设计图 注:通过临摹绘图测的截骨厚度约21 mm,A、B图像阴影表示术前、术后截骨块位置Note: the thickness of the osteotomy measured by copying and drawing is about 21 mm, and the shadows in images A and B represent the position of the osteotomy block before and after surgery
Figure 1 Preoperative design drawings of ERAO
表1 患者术前、术后后各项指标情况(
Table 1 Various indicators of patients before and after surgery
图2 术前X线骨盆正位片,示左侧DDH(发育性髋关节发育不良) 图3 左髋ERAO(偏心性旋转截骨术)术后左髋正位片,示髋臼覆盖满意 图4 ERAO(偏心性旋转截骨术)术后6个月左髋正位片,示截骨基本愈合 图5 ERAO(偏心性旋转截骨术)术后7年左髋正位片,示LCE角、AHI等指标良好,关节间隙未见明显狭窄
Figure 2 X-ray image of pelvis at anteroposterior position before surgery, showing left DDH Figure 3 X-ray image of left hip at anteroposterior position after ERAO, showing satisfactory postoperative acetabular coverage Figure 4 X-ray image of left hip at anteroposterior position six months after ERAO, showing good healing of osteotomy site Figure 5 X-ray image of left hip at anteroposterior position seven years after ERAO, showing good LCE angle and AHI, without obvious joint space narrowing
图6 术前骨盆正位X线片提示双侧DDH(发育性髋关节发育不良),右髋继发严重骨关节炎 图7 左髋ERAO(偏心性旋转截骨术)术后1年骨盆正位X线片,示左髋头臼匹配良好
Figure 6 X-ray image of pelvis at anteroposterior position before surgery, showing bilateral DDH and secondary severe osteoarthritis of the right hip Figure 7 X-ray image of pelvis at anteroposterior position one year after ERAO for left hip, showing that the left hip and acetabulum were well matched
图8 ERAO(偏心性旋转截骨术)术后2年左髋正侧位X线片,示LCEA(外侧中心边缘角)、AHI(头臼指数)明显改善
Figure 8 Anteroposterior and lateral views left hip on X-ray images two years after ERAO,showing significant improvement in LCE angle and AHI
图9 ERAO(偏心性旋转截骨术)术后5年行右髋人工关节置换术后骨盆正位X线片,示关节间隙尚可
Figure 9 Five years after ERAO,X ray image of pelvis at anteroposterior position following the right hip replacement,showing acceptable joint space
[1]
Sioutis S,Kolovos S,Papakonstantinou ME,et al. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: areview[J]. J Long Term Eff Med Implants,2022,32( 3 ): 39-56.
[2]
王明俊,聂德新,孙锦波,等. 发育性髋关节发育不良早期诊治研究进展[J/OL]. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2023,7( 3 ):130-134.
[3]
胡华林,赵明兴,高志朝. 发育性髋关节发育不良的手术治疗进展[J]. 临床骨科杂志,2022,25( 2 ): 300-303.
[4]
Hasegawa Y,Iwase T,Kitamura S,et al. Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia: follow-up of one hundred and thirty-two hips for five to ten years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2002,84( 3 ): 404-410.
[5]
Hasegawa Y. Surgical techniques of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy[J/OL]. JBJS Essent Surg Tech,2015,5( 3 ): e18. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.N.00099.
[6]
盛璞义,李子卿,杨兴,等. 偏心髋臼旋转截骨术的生物力学机制及初步临床疗效[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2015,35( 3 ): 218-226.
[7]
陈俊文,钟昌恒,江宜松,等. 发育性髋关节发育不良早期诊断的研究进展[J]. 中国医药,2020,15( 12 ): 1963-1966.
[8]
Doski J,Mosa L,Hassawi Q. An upgrade of the international hip dysplasia institute classification for developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. Clin Orthop Surg,2022,14( 1 ): 141-147.
[9]
高天阳,王丰哲,潘诗农. 影像学诊断发育性髋关节发育不良并发股骨头坏死进展[J]. 中国医学影像技术,2020,36( 12 ):1911-1914.
[10]
Venkatadass K,Durga Prasad V,Al Ahmadi NMM,et al. Pelvic osteotomies in hip dysplasia: why,when and how?[J]. EFORT Open Rev,2022,7( 2 ): 153-163.
[11]
O'Beirne JG,Chlapoutakis K,Alshryda S,et al. International interdisciplinary consensus meeting on the evaluation of developmental dysplasia of the hip[J]. Ultraschall Med,2019,40( 4 ):454-464.
[12]
沈彬. 发育性髋关节发育不良的保髋和置换手术——从儿童、青少年到成人的标准化阶梯治疗[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35( 12 ): 1509-1512.
[13]
周冬长,梁建斌,任健,等. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨与Chiari截骨治疗髋臼发育不良的短期疗效比较[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报,2016,41( 8 ): 1006-1008.
[14]
秦勇,程实,马欣楠,等. 髋臼旋转截骨术治疗成人髋臼发育不良的疗效分析[J]. 实用骨科杂志,2016,22( 6 ): 503-506.
[15]
彭建平,李扬,肖飞,等. 髋臼周围截骨术联合髋关节镜治疗髋关节发育不良的回顾性研究[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究,2023,20( 4 ): 9-13.
[16]
程徽,张洪,罗殿中,等. 伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节发育不良的中长期疗效[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2014( 12 ): 1190-1197.
[17]
严广斌. Bernese髋臼周围截骨术[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2014,8( 5 ): 695.
[18]
李伟峰. Bernese髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节发育不良的短期疗效分析[D]. 广州: 广州中医药大学,2021.
[19]
石志伟,顾言阁,靳文舒,等. 相关因素对发育性髋关节发育不良Bernese髋臼周围截骨术治疗效果的影响研究进展[J]. 山东医药,2022,62( 18 ): 100-103.
[20]
Yasunaga Y,Tanaka R,Mifuji K,et al. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for symptomatic hip dysplasia in patients younger than 21 years of age: seven- to 30-year survival outcomes[J]. Bone Joint J,2019,101-B( 4 ): 390-395.
[21]
Nozawa M,Shitoto K,Matsuda K,et al. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia. A follow-up for more than ten years[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2002,84( 1 ): 59-65.
[22]
Ueda T,Tohkura A. Evaluation of isokinetic hip strength after rotational acetabular osteotomy[J]. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi,1993,67( 12 ): 1105-1113.
[23]
Amano T,Hasegawa Y,Seki T,et al. A pre-operative predictive score for the outcome of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy in the treatment of acetabular dysplasia and early osteoarthritis of the hip in adults[J]. Bone Joint J,2016,98-B( 10 ): 1326-1332.
[24]
Irie T,Takahashi D,Asano T,et al. Comparison of femoral head translation following eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy and rotational acetabular osteotomy[J]. Hip Int,2017,27( 1 ): 49-54.
[25]
Osawa Y,Seki T,Takegami Y,et al. Factors affecting return to sports after eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy[J/OL]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2023,109( 4 ): 103442. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103442.
[26]
Amano T,Hasegawa Y,Seki T,et al. Preoperative prognosis score is a useful tool regarding eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy in patients with acetabular dysplasia[J]. J Orthop Sci,2016,21( 3 ):348-353.
[27]
Osawa Y,Hasegawa Y,Seki T. Long-term outcomes of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy for hip dysplasia[J]. J Arthroplasty,2020,35( 1 ): 17-22.
[28]
Shimamura M,Iwata K,Fujiki T,et al. Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy using computed navigation guidance for developmental dysplasia of the hip,sacroiliac fusion,and femoroacetabular impingement owing to acetabular retroversion:acase report[J]. Orthop Surg,2021,13( 7 ): 2177-2181.
[29]
Imai H,Takeba J,Maruishi A,et al. Computer-assisted anteverting eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for recurrent posterior dislocation associated with acetabular retroversion: a case report[J/OL].J Med Case Rep,2019,13( 1 ): 4. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-018-1949-8.
[30]
张阳春,余世明,黄少华,等. 偏心髋臼旋转截骨术后的全髋关节置换术[J]. 中山大学学报( 医学科学版 ),2016,37( 1 ):125-130.
[31]
向珊珊,陈艺,傅明,等. 髋臼旋转截骨术时髋臼后上方植骨前后髋关节生物力学的改变及其对比[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志( 电子版 ),2012,6( 3 ): 438-444.
[32]
Hasegawa Y,Masui T,Yamaguchi J,et al. Factors leading to osteoarthritis after eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2007,459: 207-215.
[33]
Amano T,Hasegawa Y,Kawasaki M,et al. Surgical education of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for hip trainees[J]. Hip Int,2016,26( 2 ): 180-185.
[1] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[2] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[3] 张盼盼, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 林仙方, 惠姗姗, 沈婷婷. 胎儿左心房后间隙指数在胎儿肺动脉瓣缺如综合征中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 391-398.
[4] 孔德铭, 刘铮, 李睿, 钱文伟, 王飞, 蔡道章, 柴伟. 人工智能辅助全髋关节置换三维术前规划准确性评价[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 431-438.
[5] 曾敬, 吴冬冬, 邵明, 范震波, 王治国, 刘培谊, 兰海峰. 高龄髋部骨折患者不同手术时机的围手术期疗效评估[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-449.
[6] 赵飞鸿, 陈颖杰, 林静芳, 郑晓春, 廖燕凌. 超声引导下周围神经阻滞对髋膝关节置换术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 457-468.
[7] 李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[8] 何淳诺, 田志敏, 李焕玺, 吴昊越, 庄凯鹏, 周胜虎, 张浩强. 小儿发育性髋关节发育不良诊治的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 497-504.
[9] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[10] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[11] 吕小飞, 赵舸. 皮下预置盲襻型胆肠吻合术治疗成人先天性胆管扩张症[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 258-261.
[12] 曾纪晓, 徐晓钢, 王欣星, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 梁子建, 叶志华, 罗媛圆. 达芬奇机器人辅助Swenson-like巨结肠根治术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 239-243.
[13] 王双兴, 吴永杰, 孟兵, 张宏涛, 刁美, 张辉. 微创切口联合腹腔镜同期治疗先天性心脏病合并心外畸形[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 244-249.
[14] 房桂彬, 肖进, 傅光涛, 郑秋坚. 老年髋部骨折患者术后1年行走能力的影响因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 273-280.
[15] 高广涵, 张耀南, 石磊, 王林, 王飞, 郑子天, 王鸿禹, 郭民政, 薛庆云. 膝骨关节炎患者前交叉韧带功能影像学影响因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 301-307.
阅读次数
全文


摘要